<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Zune 2.0 is Ok, but&#8230; Review</title>
	<link>http://gotzune.com/2007/11/another-zune-20-is-ok-but-review</link>
	<description>Microsoft Zune Love on the Interwebs!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://gotzune.com/2007/11/another-zune-20-is-ok-but-review#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gotzune.com/2007/11/another-zune-20-is-ok-but-review#comment-1742</guid>
		<description>i don't see the problem, it's a great alternative to itunes and by far the best interface and software besides apples line.

Its like a 1a and 1b type choice when picking an mp3 player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t see the problem, it&#8217;s a great alternative to itunes and by far the best interface and software besides apples line.</p>
<p>Its like a 1a and 1b type choice when picking an mp3 player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaxim</title>
		<link>http://gotzune.com/2007/11/another-zune-20-is-ok-but-review#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaxim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gotzune.com/2007/11/another-zune-20-is-ok-but-review#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>Although I think the Zune 80 is slightly better than the iPod Classic, I'm not all that convince that the flash Zune is better than the current nano.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I think the Zune 80 is slightly better than the iPod Classic, I&#8217;m not all that convince that the flash Zune is better than the current nano.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
